<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Warping it up! &#187; Usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/tag/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log</link>
	<description>Fini Alring's Glossy Tech Zine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:42:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Glide (Not So) Effortless</title>
		<link>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/12/01/glide-not-so-effortless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/12/01/glide-not-so-effortless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fini Alring</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effortless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I read about this new product / killer-app thingy.. Supposedly let&#8217;s you do just about anything with media from handling mail, chat, calendar, music, photos and what have you&#8230; the tool is called &#8220;Glide Effortless&#8221;, and rumours about it being a UI wonder and all, I had to try it out for myself. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I read about this new product / killer-app thingy.. Supposedly let&#8217;s you do just about anything with media from handling mail, chat, calendar, music, photos and what have you&#8230;</p>
<p>the tool is called &#8220;Glide Effortless&#8221;, and rumours about it being a UI wonder and all, I had to try it out for myself.</p>
<p>As normal procedure I always try to scan the site for validity and trust matters, by asking myself a set of rather simple questions; who are these people? where do they come from?, do I trust them? and last but not least what&#8217;s the catch? (price)</p>
<p>I was a little confused by the obvious lack of any pricing information, but decided to try and sign up.. All went pretty good.. Hmm suddenly it required my full address, and I mean required as in you have to fill it to continue. Eager as I was I happily typed it in.. And hit next button on the sign-up wizard&#8230;</p>
<p>Then it happened, I was asked to choose a product subscription type ranging from free 100mb account to some expensive ones, seemingly only to differentiate by the data storage limitations. Not being a complete retard I choose free account as my first choice, strangely enough this was the last available option &#8211; they seem to think free version should be your last choice!!? Not so logical approach since everyone naturally wants to evaluate such a product before buying it (with all the hype this product should sell itself, should it not??).</p>
<p>Then I was presented with a nice screen telling me to give away my creditcard information, even though I had choosen a free subscription, they wrote they needed the information in order to validate my personal information.</p>
<p>Oh well.. The result was that, I like most sane people; hit the &#8220;Cancel&#8221; button, the wizard closed &#8211; and I will continue to try and live happily without this marvel of state-of-the-art oracle of an application&#8230;</p>
<p>I did however get a good laugh when reading about their patent pending ui &#8220;navigation bubbles&#8221;, which more or less resembles 200 game ui&#8217;s already.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.glidedigital.com/">Glide Effortless</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/12/01/glide-not-so-effortless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSS3: Multi-column Demo for Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/09/30/css3-multi-column-demo-for-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/09/30/css3-multi-column-demo-for-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fini Alring</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W3C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the beginning of web design, there has always been a need to make multi-columned text pages. Sadly HTML and CSS 1+2 has rather weak support for this kind of wrapping techniques. Many workarounds have been created for this using JavaScript and server side pages. But the draft specification of &#8220;CSS3 module: Multi-column layout&#8221; promises [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the beginning of web design, there has always been a need to make multi-columned text pages. Sadly HTML and CSS 1+2 has rather weak support for this kind of wrapping techniques. Many workarounds have been created for this using JavaScript and server side pages. But the draft specification of &#8220;<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-multicol-20010118/">CSS3 module: Multi-column layout</a>&#8221; promises to solve this &#8220;column problem&#8221; by adding a set of CSS properties.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/">Mozilla Firefox 1.5 beta</a> adds preliminary support for these properties, so that developer can begin playing with it, not however that the reason the properties begin with &#8220;-moz-&#8221; is that the CSS3 Multi-column specification is still a draft, so therefore they should not be used for real web design yet, unless it can make a clean fallback when meeting non-mozilla 1.5+ clients.</p>
<p>I have created <a href="http://www.bytefarmers.com/codepit/css/css3_multicol_demo.html">CSS3: Multi-column module demo for Firefox 1.5 beta</a> &#8211; which shows some of the wonders of the new multi-column features, as well a some other CSS properties to create a nice flowing page with highly dynamic columns, and pretty stable compared to many of the older methods, but you need to use <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/">Mozilla Firefox 1.5 beta</a> &#8211; which I would only recommend to Web Developers.</p>
<p>You can also check some screenshots of the demo, showing it&#8217;s ability to create as many columns as it can, while maintaining nice readability thru limited line-width.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="10">
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fini/47934011/" title="When resized this small, it uses single-column layout. Suitable for 640x480."><img src="http://static.flickr.com/28/47934011_6b2b7e555e_t.jpg" width="79" height="100" alt="CSS3 Multi-column demo 0.2b 001" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fini/47934015/" title="Dual columns! Suitable for 800x600."><img src="http://static.flickr.com/29/47934015_841b799b8d_t.jpg" width="100" height="86" alt="CSS3 Multi-column demo 0.2b 002" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fini/47934028/" title="Triple-columns, suitable for 1024x768."><img src="http://static.flickr.com/24/47934028_b9f4f959c6_t.jpg" width="100" height="59" alt="CSS3 Multi-column demo 0.2b 003" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fini/47934058/" title="Quad-columns, suitable for 1280x1024."><img src="http://static.flickr.com/26/47934058_a46305cc7d_t.jpg" width="100" height="49" alt="CSS3 Multi-column demo 0.2b 004" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fini/47934073/" title="5-columns with reduced font-size, suitable for 1280x1024."><img src="http://static.flickr.com/30/47934073_8bc11c5da9_t.jpg" width="100" height="69" alt="CSS3 Multi-column demo 0.3b 001" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe the rumours, check the demo yourself here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bytefarmers.com/codepit/css/css3_multicol_demo.html">CSS3: Multi-column module demo for Firefox 1.5 beta</a> </p>
<p>See more code samples at <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/CSS3_Columns">Mozilla Developer: CSS3 Columns</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/css3multicolumn">A List Apart: Articles: Introducing the CSS3 Multi-Column Module</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/09/30/css3-multi-column-demo-for-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berkun: Why I switched to Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/09/16/berkun-why-i-switched-to-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/09/16/berkun-why-i-switched-to-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fini Alring</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/09/16/berkun-why-i-switched-to-firefox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Berkun &#8211; a former Microsoft IE UI designer &#8211; has written a story with some points why he switched to Firefox, and a list of the UI problems he found within his first week of firefoxing.. Scott Berkun: &#8220;Itâ€™s a sad day and a good day. For years Iâ€™ve held onto my IE install [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scottberkun.com/">Scott Berkun</a> &#8211; a former Microsoft <abbr title="Internet Explorer">IE</abbr> <abbr title="User Interface">UI</abbr> designer &#8211; has written a story with some points why he switched to <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">Firefox</a>, and a list of the <abbr title="User Interface">UI</abbr> problems he found within his first week of firefoxing..</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.scottberkun.com/">Scott Berkun</a>: &#8220;Itâ€™s a sad day and a good day. For years Iâ€™ve held onto my <abbr title="Internet Explorer">IE</abbr> install out of love. I worked on <abbr title="Internet Explorer">IE</abbr> 1.0 thru 5.0, and was one of the people that designed much of its <abbr title="User Interface">UI</abbr>. But my love for the past has faded. Last week I switched to <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">Firefox</a>: and Iâ€™ve been happy.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/?p=115">Berkun blog: Why I switched to Firefox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/09/16/berkun-why-i-switched-to-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AJAX in practice and it&#8217;s problems</title>
		<link>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/05/13/ajax-in-practice-and-its-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/05/13/ajax-in-practice-and-its-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 22:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fini Alring</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XMLHttpRequest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/05/13/ajax-in-practice-and-its-problems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Baekdal writes about the usability issues of XML/JS/HTML or these days just AJAX. * Usability issues with XMLHttpRequest. * Usable XMLHttpRequest in Practice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.baekdal.com">Thomas Baekdal</a> writes about the usability issues of XML/JS/HTML or these days just AJAX.</p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.baekdal.com/articles/Usability/XMLHttpRequest-guidelines/">Usability issues with XMLHttpRequest.</a></p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.baekdal.com/articles/usability/usable-XMLHttpRequest/">Usable XMLHttpRequest in Practice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bytefarmers.com/log/2005/05/13/ajax-in-practice-and-its-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/19 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.bytefarmers.com @ 2012-02-09 01:26:03 -->
